Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Disiplin Kerja dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Melalui Kepuasan Kerja

Main Article Content

M. Abdul Aziz

Abstract

The purpose of this study were 1) to describe the motivation, discipline, work environment, satisfaction and performance 2) to analyze the influence of motivation, discipline, work environment to the satisfaction 3) to analyze the influence of motivation, discipline, work environment on employee performance 4) for analyze the influence of satisfaction on the performance of employee 5) to analyze the influence of motivation, discipline, work environment to performance through employee satisfaction. Respondents in this study as many as 99 people. The respondents are the employees of clinic balapulang. This study uses Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was run through AMOS 4.00 as a tool of analysis. The results of data analysis proves motivation, discipline, work environment, significantly influence satisfaction as evidenced from the value of standardized regression coefficients (beta) of 0.01, discipline on job satisfaction to get a value of 0.81 and work environment to job satisfaction of obtained a value of 0.29. motivation, discipline and work environment significantly influence the performance of employees as evidenced from the value of standardized regression coefficients (beta) leadership on teacher performance gain value of 0.20, discipline on employees performance gain value of 1,32 and work environment on employees performance gain value of 0.62. Satisfaction significantly influence the performance of employees. This is evidenced from the p-value is very small (<0.001). Motivation, discipline, and work environment significantly influence performance through employees satisfaction as evidenced from the results sanggat pvalue small (<0.001).

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi, 2002, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Edisi Revisi, Cetakan Kedelapan. Penerbit Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
As`Ad Moh. 2003. Psikologi Industri. Galia Indonesia. Yogyakarta.
Dessler, Gary, 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta.
Dharma, Surya. 2002. Paradigma Baru: Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Amara Books. Yogyakarta.
Fadel, Muhammad. 2007. Reinventing Government (Pengalaman Dari Daerah). Pt. Elex Media Komputindo. Jakarta
Fanny Putriningrum. 2015. Pengaruh Kompensasi, Motivasi, Disiplin Kerja, Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pt. Sampharindo Perdana Semarang. Dokumen Karya Ilmiah Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Semarang. Eprints.Dinus.Ac.Id/8767/1/Jurnal_13446.Pdf
Fathonah, Sitidan Ida Utami. 2012. Pengaruh Kompensasi, Pengembangan Karir, Lingkungan Kerjadan Komitmen Organsias Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Pegawai Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Karanganyar Dengan Keyakinan Diri (Self Efficacy) Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Jurnal Stieaub Surakarta. Fakhar (2014)
M. Abdul Aziz: Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja...
Fuad Mas’ud, 2004. Survai Diagnosis Organisasional (Konsepdan Aplikasi), Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Gita Sugiarti. 2013. Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja, Budaya Organisasi Dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Pegawai (Studi Pada Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang. Jurnal Serata Citya Jurnal Ilmiah Untag Semarang. Vol 1, No 2.
Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Pt. Bumi Aksara.
Hasibuan, Malayu, S.P., 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Revisi: Pt. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta
Hasibuan, Malayu S. P. 2001.Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Revisi: Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
Hasibuan, Malayu, S.P. 2003. Manajemen Dasar, Pengertiandan Masalah. Pt. Toko Gunung Agung. Jakarta.
Ismiyarto, Sri Suwitri, Y. Warella & Sundarso. 2015. Organizational Culture, Motivation, Job Satisfaction And Performance Of Employees Toward The Implementation Of Internal Bureaucracy Reform In The Ministry For The Empowerment Of State Apparatus And Bureaucracy Reform (The Ministry Of Panrb). Journal Of Management And Sustainability; Vol. 5, No. 1; 2015.
I Putu Sedhana Yasa. 2013. Pengaruh Kompensasi Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Dan Kinerja Pegawai Pada Karma Jimbaran. Jurnal Vol 3, No 10 (2014). Ojs.Unud.Ac.Id
Irawan, Prasetya. 2006. Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif Untuk Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Departemen Ilmu Adminstrasi Fisip Ui.
Jonathan Sarwono, 2007.Analisis Jalur Untuk Riset Bisnis Dengan Spss. Andi Offset. Yogyakarta.
Kirkpatrick, D.L., Kirkpatrick, J.D., 2006. Evaluating Training Program; The Four Levels, 3rd Edition. Berrett Koehler, Inc. San Fransisco
Kreitner, Robert, Dan Angelo Kinicki. 2001. Organizational Behavior. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Mangkunegara, Dr. A.A. Anwar Prabu. 2005. Evaluasi Kinerja Sdm. Penerbit Refika Aditama. Bandung
Mangkunegara, Dr. A.A. Anwar Prabu. 2005. Evaluasi Kinerja Sdm. Penerbit Refika Aditama. Bandung.
Mathis, R Dan Jackson, W.2006. Human Resources Development (Track Mba Series/Terjemahan). Prestasi Pustaka. Jakarta.
Nurcahyani, Ni Made & I.G.A. Dewi Adnyani. 2016. Pengaruh Kompensasi Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dengan Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening. E-Jurnal Manajemen Unud, Vol. 5, No.1, 2016: 500 - 532 Issn: 2302-8912 500 Bali, Indonesia Nursalam, 2008
Pasolong, Harbani. 2010. Teori Administrasi Publik. Alfabeta. Bandung.